Home Insurance Law Taylor Swift, Ticketmaster, and Antitrust Troubles

Taylor Swift, Ticketmaster, and Antitrust Troubles

Taylor Swift, Ticketmaster, and Antitrust Troubles


A surge in demand for a particular live performance tour overwhelmed the web ticketing web site, shutting it down. It occurs. No massive deal. Proper?

There’s a little bit extra to the story.

What occurred?

Ticketmaster dealt with ticket gross sales for 47 of 52 dates for Taylor Swift’s first tour since 2018. The “Eras” tour required verified followers to register on the Ticketmaster web site. Registered followers would obtain a code permitting them to buy the ticket.

Thus far, so good.

Nonetheless, the quantity of requests for presale tickets was unprecedented. It led to glitches and lengthy wait instances. Some waited as much as eight hours however didn’t get tickets. The corporate tried to justify the glitches to bot assaults from scalpers wanting to purchase tickets to resell. It subsequently cancelled the overall sale, saying it was because of a scarcity of stock. Pissed off Swiftie followers weren’t shopping for it. Hundreds of thousands have been unable to purchase a ticket, together with Capital One card holders. 

Regardless of the eye it garnered, the underlying occasion sounds affordable on the face of it. It’s not the primary time a web site has gotten overwhelmed by huge demand. Nonetheless, the idea for the criticism levelled at Ticketmaster was its monopoly on the web ticketing trade. Critics say it expenses exorbitant charges and hoards tickets on the market on their secondary market web site by resellers. Since Ticketmaster has unique rights to live performance venues, it forces artists and followers to make use of their web site.

The uproar was so huge amongst Swifties that it shone a light-weight on one thing creating over three a long time.

A Lengthy-Standing Challenge

Ticketmaster has been thrilling the ire of artists and lawmakers for a very long time. In 1994, Pearl Jam band members Jeff Ament and Stone Gossard appeared earlier than Congress to offer testimony. That they had filed an antitrust criticism towards Ticketmaster for…$2.20.

The criticism resulted from a disagreement between Ticketmaster and Pearl Jam over the service price cost. The band needed it capped at $1.80, and Ticketmaster refused. Keep in mind that overcharging is likely one of the allegations introduced towards Ticketmaster in 2023. On the time, ticketing firms sometimes charged a minimal of $4 for these charges.

The Justice Division had already had a watch on Ticketmaster, which held about 90 per cent of the ticket market then. When it heard concerning the dispute, it suggested the band founders to file a criticism. Nonetheless, nothing got here out of it on the time regardless of the listening to.

The DOJ did slap Ticketmaster with oversight in 2010 when it allowed its merger with Dwell Nation. The phrases of the Ultimate Judgment prohibited retaliatory actions towards live performance venues for working with different ticketing firms for ten years. Nonetheless, as a result of Dwell Nation repeatedly violated the consent decree phrases, there’s a transfer to modify and prolong it for one more 65 months.

Lawsuits and Rules

A law book with a gavel - Antitrust law

Lawmakers and music followers are sad with Ticketmaster, continually making it a goal for criticism. The newest challenge relating to the Taylor Swift debacle merely follows up on earlier points. Nonetheless, the Swift state of affairs highlighted the primary downside as a result of it brought about an uproar from its huge fan base. 

Dwell Nation head honcho Jeff Ament testified earlier than the Senate that the newest debacle was because of a cyberattack, however it wasn’t simply that. Ticketmaster merely have little motivation to offer high quality customer support as a result of there’s no competitors within the house.

Again in 1994, with the Pearl Jam challenge, Ament and Vedder opined that it was all posture by the DOJ. Ticketmaster suffered no antitrust repercussions, so when the band tried to freeze out Ticketmaster of their 1995 tour, they couldn’t. 

Ticketmaster had a stranglehold on most live performance venues within the US, so Pearl Jam needed to guide with ski resorts and different odd locations. The tour was a catastrophe, in order that they cancelled the rest of their performances about midway by way of. That they had no alternative however to work with Ticketmaster on their subsequent excursions.

Civil lawsuit

Quick ahead to 2023, and Ticketmaster is once more in a authorized tussle. Numerous Swifties filed a civil lawsuit, alleging that Ticketmaster and Dwell Nation engaged in anti-competitive behaviour. They pressure concertgoers to pay quite a few charges, resulting in greater ticket costs they can’t get wherever else.

Moreover, the corporate claimed that bots have been accountable for the lengthy waits and cancelled ticket gross sales. Nonetheless, it established a Verified Fan system to stop that challenge. Solely followers with a presale code might buy tickets throughout the promoting interval. 

The lawsuit alleges that the true downside was the corporate issued 1.4 million codes, exceeding the capability of the venues. In consequence, many followers with codes waited for hours to buy their tickets, solely to be turned away. There have been merely not sufficient seats, and Ticketmaster knew it.

Furthermore, Ticketmaster profited from the resale market by imposing a price for fan-to-fan ticket exchanges. The lawsuit additionally alleges that Ticketmaster forces common artists to work with them due to their agreements with giant venues.

Ticketmaster apologized to Swifties and promised to enhance their tech to stop such points from taking place once more. It was to no avail. Followers are out for blood.

The lawsuit seeks damages of $2,500 per violation, referring to every occasion the place a fan couldn’t get tickets. As a result of the incident concerned tens of millions of dissatisfied Swifties, the ultimate depend might imply a major payout for the defendant.

The plaintiffs declare that the cash is secondary. The purpose of the lawsuit was to make sure that it by no means occurred once more. It desires Ticketmaster to relinquish its monopoly on the web ticket trade, making costs and entry aggressive once more. 

If profitable, followers with few sources might file their motion with pay as you go regulation companies after checking LegalShield critiques. It might occur fairly simply, contemplating Ticketmaster is at present embattled.

Again earlier than the DOJ

The uproar from outraged and outright hysterical Taylor Swift followers attracted the eye of stories shops and a few lawmakers. It led to a congressional listening to and a DOJ investigation. Individuals needed to know what occurred and why such a preventable incident was allowed to happen. Some consider it was a predatory monopoly that might unfold past the reside occasion trade and have an effect on the typical client’s day by day life.

The DOJ did modify and prolong the 2010 Ultimate Judgement towards Ticketmaster designed to deal with these anti-competitive points. Below the phrases of this judgment, Ticketmaster needed to promote its ticketing service subsidiary, Paciolan, to Comcast. It should additionally license its ticketing software program to AEG, Dwell Nation’s competitor. The phrases of the judgment additionally prohibited retaliation towards venues for working with different ticketing firms. The modification prolonged the prohibitions to 2025.

Alistair Vigier, the CEO of Clearway Legislation, mentioned “It might not be sufficient to assuage the overall dissatisfaction with the problem. Rumours abound that the DOJ might file an antitrust lawsuit towards Dwell Nation and its subsidiary, Ticketmaster, by the top of 2023. The claims might embrace allegations of abuses of energy that might result in the corporate’s breakup.”

If true, the lawsuit wouldn’t be the primary filed by competitors enforcers towards the embattled reside occasion firm. The DOJ filed one which resulted in findings in 2019 that the corporate had violated the phrases of the 2010 consent decree. It was compelling venues to make use of Ticketmaster for Dwell Nation performances, penalizing those that refused. The DOJ fined the corporate $1 million for violations and once more prohibited it from tying companies.

There was no affirmation so far that the DOJ will file a lawsuit in 2023. Nonetheless, it triggered one other authorized battle.

Investor troubles

The corporate might also be in bother with its buyers. Legislation companies representing Dwell Nation buyers are trying into claims that it issued deceptive or false statements disclaiming any authorized vulnerability for his or her enterprise practices. The straw that introduced the camel’s again was once more the Taylor Swift incident. Within the fast aftermath, share costs fell practically eight per cent. Naturally sufficient, that brought about concern amongst buyers.

Ticketmaster assured buyers that cancelling the general public sale of Swift live performance tickets wouldn’t result in any authorized points. It claimed there was no critical proof to assist an antitrust lawsuit following the incident. There had been greater than sufficient competitors from different firms.

Civil litigants and the DOJ consider in any other case. Instantly after rumours concerning the DOJ’s plans to file an antitrust lawsuit started circulating, buyers filed a category motion case towards Dwell Nation

Plaintiffs alleged to the California federal court docket on August 4, 2023, that the corporate lied about their enterprise practices. These embrace bundling companies, charging bloated charges, retaliating towards venues working with different ticketing firms, and fascinating in secondary ticketing.


There isn’t a query that the Taylor Swift incident occurred partly due to the unprecedented demand for tickets. It might occur anytime a live performance or tour induces loyal followers to exert extraordinary effort to acquire tickets. Nonetheless, the issue with Ticketmaster is it engaged in questionable conduct in addressing the problem. These embrace promising extra tickets than they may challenge and charging service charges for peer-to-peer exchanges.

The corporate additional exacerbated the problem by making questionable statements. They claimed {that a} cyberattack had overloaded their web site, resulting in the cancellation of the general public sale of tickets. Nonetheless, that they had issued presale codes to stop simply such a difficulty. As well as, they lied to buyers about their authorized vulnerability within the aftermath. Lastly, they allegedly violated the phrases of their consent decree with the DOJ with impunity regardless of warnings and fines.

The irony is the Taylor Swift tour mustn’t have been Dwell Nation’s downside. The promoter is AEG Presents, not Dwell Nation. Nonetheless, AEG had no alternative however to make use of Ticketmaster due to Dwell Nation’s unique agreements with venues they needed to guide. If these agreements had not been in place, AEG would almost certainly have distributed ticketing companies to a number of firms. The Eras tour would most likely not be the hill on which Ticketmaster would probably die.




Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here